¡@

Youth Study Series No.40

October 2008

A Study on the Long-term Social Welfare Planning for Hong Kong

    

        The white paper on social welfare issued in 1965 started the long-term planning of the government in this aspect.  After the government had released the white paper on Social Welfare Aims and Policies in Hong Kong in this particular year, subsequent white papers were issued in 1973, 1979 and 1991, setting targets and concrete plans for the social welfare development of Hong Kong in the future.  Besides the white papers, the government formulated "program plans" in the mid-1970s for specific services, such as rehabilitation, youth services and elderly services.  At the same time, "five-year plans" were set up to keep social welfare developments under review.  Recently, such planning has been made by "annual consultations" on the related sectors.  The above planning mechanisms have played a positive role in the different stages of development, yielding recognized results.

        However, all social systems should keep up with the times and adjust to changes to facilitate continuous growth and development.  As a highly-developed and densely-populated international city, Hong Kong has experienced increasingly complicated social problems and greater challenges to its social welfare system.  The change in the political and economic environment, the structural change in population, the expectations of the citizens on social welfare, the contributions made by the welfare budget, the core social values of welfare as well as the demands on the quality of welfare services can all have major affects on the long-term planning of social welfare policies.

        Developing a sustainable social welfare system is the long-term target of any society.  The social welfare planning in Hong Kong also needs to be reformed to establish a new system catering to the social demands of the present and, at the same time, addressing the social benefits in the long term with broad and visionary considerations.  In order to solicit opinions of the public and, in particular the younger generation, regarding future welfare planning, this study has been conducted through an integration of relevant data and measurements from mega trends in the current social context, interviews with experts and academics as well as a territory-wide survey of Hong Kong people.  It is hoped that this study will provide insights of the issues at hand and will result in recommendations which could be suggested for future welfare planning.

         A synthesis of observations from mega trends in the current social context is complemented with literature reviews to anticipate future trends and its implications to social welfare planning. 

        Interviews with academics and specialists were conducted in the period between May and July 2008.  11 persons were interviewed, among them academics, representatives from social welfare service organizations and social workers.  Their observations and opinions regarding the long-term social welfare planning for Hong Kong were sought.

        In order to gauge the attitudes and opinions of Hong Kong people regarding the future development of social welfare services, a telephone survey was conducted between the 3rd and the 11th of July, 2008.  By random sampling, 1019 eligible Hong Kong people aged 15 or above were successfully polled, yielding a response rate of 67%, with a standard error within ¡Ó1.6%.

        The following eight points are concluded for the consideration of long-term welfare planning:

1.      Affirm the importance of the formulation of long-term strategic welfare planning.

2.      The Government should have a clear and definite role in welfare planning. 

3.      Should address the problem of welfare resources keeping in mind the implication of maintaining the sustainability of welfare services.

4.      Enhance the professionalism as well as the autonomy of non-governmental organizations to provide welfare services.

5.      Welfare planning should consider the uniqueness of a district and also facilitate the deployment of resources between the centre and the district.

6.    Strengthen family solidarity and provide needy families with services.

7.      Broaden public participation and discussion in welfare planning.

8.      Monitor the trends and respond to the needs of society

  

-End- 

¡@

Order Form

 

 

¡@